Uranium traces found at a Syrian site bombed by Israel were not
sufficient evidence of undeclared nuclear activity but Syria must
be more open to help clarify the issue, the head of the UN atomic
watchdog said.
"We won't be able to reach a quick conclusion unless we have
credible information," International Atomic Energy Agency Director
Mohamed ElBaradei told a news conference in Dubai.
"There was uranium but it does not mean there was a
reactor."
The IAEA inquiry was spurred by US intelligence that the site was a
secret nuclear reactor Syria had almost completed when it was
reduced to rubble by an Israeli air raid last year.
Syria has said the target was a disused military building.
ElBaradei said the uranium particles were not highly enriched - the
type used to fuel atomic bombs.
"It could have come in so many different ways .... We are
looking at so many different scenarios," he said.
Both Syria and Israel should do more to help the IAEA's
investigation, he said.
"We need co-operation from Syria; we need cooperation from
Israel. I would still like more transparency from the Syrians," he
added.
Diplomats monitoring the IAEA in Vienna said a week ago that
particles of uranium had been retrieved from swipe samples taken by
IAEA inspectors from the site in June.
They said the traces appeared to be of a processed form of uranium,
possibly at the stage at which it would be loaded into a reactor
for enrichment as fuel for civilian energy or for weapons.
But the origin of the traces was unclear, they said.
Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moualem last week dismissed the
disclosures about uranium particles as politically motivated and
said they could have been on munitions used by Israel to bomb the
site in September last year.
Depleted uranium is a hardening agent in some munitions.
But it is not normally used in air force ordnance and would not
have been needed to destroy the Syrian target, analysts say.
ElBaradei confirmed the IAEA's first report on its six-month-old
investigation into Syria's alleged covert atomic activity, to be
issued later this week, would not be conclusive.
"The report will say that there is still a lot of work to do.
(There will be) no conclusion on whether there was a reactor or
not," said ElBaradei, who also has been investigating Iran's
disputed nuclear enrichment programme since 2003.
Damascus denies the site was a reactor designed to produce
plutonium for atomic bombs and says the US data were forged.
In Washington, US State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said
ElBaradei's remarks were important for clarity.
"...Certainly, that would indicate that there was some basis for
this investigation and that it should continue until a full picture
is able to be drawn by the IAEA as to what exactly happened at that
site," he told a regular news briefing.
