Top Shows

Contact ONE News

Online protests over controversial copyright law

Published: 6:00AM Thursday April 14, 2011 Source: ONE News

A flurry of online protest has erupted over the government pushing controversial copyright legislation through parliament.
While the legislation is a watered down version of a bill that created international debate two years ago, it is still drawing criticism.

The Copyright (Infringing File Sharing) Amendment Bill repeals Section 92A of the Copyright Act and was passed today after an urgent sitting last night. It comes into effect from September 1.

Many have joined a "blackout" campaign to show their opposition to the move, replacing their profile pictures on Facebook and Twitter with black squares.

One Facebook campaign site has almost 2500 supporters.

The new laws mean from September 1 downloading copyright-protected material will be punishable with fines of up to $15,000, and copyright holders will be able to approach Internet Service Providers (ISPs) if they believe an ISP's client has been illegally downloading their material.

Cabinet Minister Wayne Mapp said those believed to be breaking the law will get three warnings from their ISP before further action is taken.

He said if the warnings are ignored, the copyright holder will be able to take the alleged freeloader to a special tribunal, and if they are found to have broken the law the tribunal can award costs of up to $15,000 against them.

Repeat offenders could have their internet connections cut for six months.

However on online poll on shows most people already download music legally (67%). Nineteen percent said they will be deterred by the fine, while 14% said they will not be deterred.

The legislation drew huge protest two years ago, even copping criticism from UK comedian Stephen Fry.

However protesters admit the new legislation is an improvement.

"Internet termination is something that we're fundamentally opposed to...we always have been and we always will be.  We think it's unnecessary and it's disproportionate," Bronwyn Holloway-Smith of Creative Freedom Foundation told ONE News.

The laws were agreed while parliament was sitting under urgency to pass legislation to help the rebuild of Christchurch.

Online opinions

Many people online have questioned why the issue of illegal downloads, and such an important amendment to the Copyright Act, was placed on the list for discussion.

"The abuse of urgency is starting to really concern me. What possible justification can they have for it?" wrote George Dewar on ONE News' Facebook page.

James Curry says: "It will be hard to enforce this because there are so many copyright could breaching them right now and you wouldn't know."

"Not only is the urgency process being abused," said Pirate Party secretary Noel Zeng on his website, "but our government is also exploiting the people of Christchurch by using their unfortunate situation to pass underhanded legislation."

There is also growing doubt about the effectiveness of the law.

Public Address blogger Russell Brown doesn't think the law will be particularly effective at stopping piracy.

He thinks it will be next to impossible to track downloading direct from websites and has concerns that innocent people could be prosecuted.

"It's an inadequate piece of law, albeit one markedly better than what it was designed to replace - passed overnight in vile circumstances," Brown says.

And David Farrar of Kiwiblog says the government has scored an "own goal" by pushing the legislation through under urgency - whipping up the protests.

Meanwhile, The New Zealand Federation Against Copyright Theft (NZFACT) is welcoming the enactment of the bill.

"We commend the government and the legislature for honouring their commitment to promoting and protecting the continued growth of New Zealand's creative industries," said NZFACT executive director Tony Eaton.

"The legislation enacted today will prove invaluable to our efforts to educate consumers about the value of intellectual property while at the same time deterring copyright infringement. We now look forward to its full implementation and to working with all sectors of the industry to make that happen.

ISPs say they are happy to play their part in enforcing the new laws but are concerned over who will pay the costs. Chief executive of the Telecommunication Carriers' Forum, David Stone, has said he is concerned about who will cover the costs of providing the information.

ISPs will need to provide customers' details to copyright holders, and send a warning to the user if they are suspected of breaching the law.

- with Newstalk ZB

What do you think of the law change? Have your say on the messageboard below.

Add a Comment:

Post new comment
  • deathhog40 said on 2011-06-06 @ 18:23 NZDT: Report abusive post

    I would not mind paying 50c or so for one song on Itunes, but something like $2.80 is unnaceptable. I also noticed that the price on itunes almost doubled as the law came into order. at those sort of prices, what is the use of having a ipod when the only access to music was cut off. this law is obsurd and really the music artists should have to get a job, and earn their money like the rest of us.

  • ryancaravana said on 2011-05-08 @ 12:31 NZDT: Report abusive post

    This new Law is garbage...and a display of extraordinary depth of ignorance and resistance to new technology, there are lots of other more important, more grown up and more manly issues the law makers have to focus on. File sharing is a vital internet activity.. they need to ban Youtube, dailymotion, flickr, twitter and lots of file sharing websites first before passing this bill...

  • eddiewano said on 2011-05-03 @ 22:07 NZDT: Report abusive post

    Why dont music producers grow up and find new ways to make money. If you start banning people from downloading music they wont get to hear the new music except from what is posted on the mass media. Gay. As well bands that proscute their fans will quickly have no fans. Its not rocket science here people. Record companys want to make more money and don't give a rats about the bands or the fans. Bands that are struggling financially will definitly die under these rules as well..

  • peaceandcalm said on 2011-04-16 @ 10:45 NZDT: Report abusive post

    well accually the current gove will loose elections next term becasue of this issue..40% of people are working with Internet these days from major corp to small ones they all use the internet and sharing capabilities within it... and they just lost all those voted..i would say this is the end of national as we know it...

  • Nzwrita said on 2011-04-14 @ 23:21 NZDT: Report abusive post

    5 facts 1) People will be watched on what they download so invading privacy. 2) Internet Service Providers won't want to ban people because this will lose them money 3) You ban people and people will go to Public Wifi and download from there, so who are you going to ban, the business? 4) Almost entire New Zealand's now days generation download music like this so are you going to arrest all of them? 5) Protests will happen and this will be a waste of spending money. So why bother doing it