Top Shows

Contact ONE News

New Zealand joins boycott of racism meeting

Published: 11:49AM Monday April 20, 2009 Source: ONE News

New Zealand has made a last minute decision to boycott a controversial United Nations conference on racism.
The move comes amidst growing concern it is being hijacked by Arab states looking to attack Israel.
But critics say the decision to pull out is cowardly.
It was supposed to be a coming together of nations to fight racism. Instead has descended into political bickering, culminating in a mass boycott.

"We were very surprised and shocked by these withdrawals," says Rupert Colville, UN spokesman.

New Zealand is among those pulling out of the conference, following the lead of Israel, the United States, Australia, Canada, Italy, the Netherlands and Germany.

"It's not a decision we've made lightly," says John Key, Prime Minister.

Green Party, Human Rights spokesman Keith Locke says it is a little cowardly to run away from the vigourous debate that will take place at the meeting.

"We should stand and argue our ground."

But there's concern the conference will turn into an anti-Semitic forum, led by a key speaker, the Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who's previously denied the Holocaust happened and said this just before arriving in Geneva:

"Today the Zionist Party and the Zionist ideology is the standard-bearer of racism in the world."

There's also concern at a move by Arab states to define incitement to religious hatred as a form of racism, after angry reaction to controversial Danish cartoons criticising the prophet Muhammad.

Western nations fear that would curtail free speech.

But many countries, including France and Britain, are still attending the conference. 

Opposition MPs in New Zealand say we should too. 

"That's the reality of multi-lateral conferences is that things get said you don't agree with. But you need to be there at the table to make sure your voice is heard," says  Grant Robertson, Labour's Associate Foreign Affairs spokesman.

Locke. says it's a real slap in the face for the United Nations and the nations in it, just as New Zealand has got Helen Clark in a top UN job.

Critics claim the government is simply blindly following its traditional allies.

"I think (Foreign Affairs Minister) Murray McCully needs to be very careful we don't start moving away from an independent principled stand on foreign affairs to simply follow the lead of other countries," says Robertson.

But Key says the decision not to attend the conference was principled and one he is happy to stand by.

Do you think New Zealand should boycott the anti-racism conference? Share your view on the messageboard below.

Add a Comment:

Post new comment
  • 72Albatross said on 2009-04-26 @ 03:24 NZDT: Report abusive post

    The UN having a racist conference on racism. Now I don't care who you are -- that's humourous. Having it start on Hitler's birthday,not so funny. It's fine to call out Israel when they are wrong (expanding settlements in the West Bank for one), but to legitimize an anti-Semetic Iranian agenda is wrong.

  • Free Human said on 2009-04-23 @ 07:38 NZDT: Report abusive post

    I thought its freedom of speech to speak the truth. Why would the people who claim freedom of speech boycott a conference which goes against their ideology. The solution is in debate not walkouts.

  • JimBWarrior said on 2009-04-21 @ 18:04 NZDT: Report abusive post

    I beleive John Key and team have made the right decision - Walking sends a clear message that we don't agree with the speaker - Debating the issue from the back foot is pointless - Debating the issue when BOTH parties are listening is worth while - The speech is available on the net and leaves little to debate - Onward - Jim

  • radar832004 said on 2009-04-20 @ 12:25 NZDT: Report abusive post

    the UN is a waste of time anyways when wars a raging security council debates and debates and little to no action takes place. So whats the point in this meeting? what is it going to achieve? Its not like we are going to wake up tomorrow and the world would have magically changed. The UN is tied down by red tape to be effective in anything