Published: 3:38PM Thursday November 05, 2009
Source: Reuters
Source:
Democrats in the US House of Representatives scrambled to iron
out lingering concerns over abortion in a healthcare reform bill
that was headed to a close and potentially historic weekend
debate.
House Democratic leaders planned a Saturday vote on the sweeping
overhaul, which would launch the biggest changes to the US
healthcare system since the creation of the Medicare health program
for the elderly in 1965.
"We are on the verge of doing something great," House Speaker Nancy
Pelosi, a Democrat, told reporters.
But with Republicans united in opposition, Democrats struggled to
line up the 218 votes needed to pass the bill.
"It's going to be tight," a Democratic aide said.
Democratic leaders hoped to defuse a potential uprising by
moderates within the party who want stronger language to ensure
federal funds are not used to pay for abortions under the
bill.
The overhaul, President Barack Obama's top domestic priority, is
designed to rein in costs, expand coverage to millions of uninsured
and bar insurance practices, such as denying coverage to people
with pre-existing conditions.
The House bill would require individuals to buy insurance and all
but the smallest employers to offer health coverage to workers.
It also provide subsidies to help purchase insurance and would
eliminate the industry's exemption from federal antitrust
laws.
House Democratic leaders filed largely technical last-minute
changes to the legislation late on Tuesday night, starting a
72-hour waiting period they had promised to Republicans and
clearing the way for a Saturday vote.
House Rules Committee Chairwoman Louise Slaughter said she expected
the rule-setting guidelines for the healthcare debate would
incorporate anti-abortion language proposed by Representative Brad
Ellsworth, a moderate Democrat.
His amendment would prohibit the use of federal funds to cover
abortions and also guarantee access to insurance plans that would
agree to refrain from covering abortion.
Up in the air
"My goal is to ensure that federal taxpayer dollars are not going
to abortions, but we aren't there yet," he told reporters.
"I think it's still pretty much up in the air."
Ellsworth's amendment has been attacked by some anti-abortion
Democrats and the National Right to Life Committee, which called it
a political fig leaf and urged Democrats to vote down any rule that
included it.
The group prefers a proposal by Representative Bart Stupak, who
leads about 40 moderate Democrats vowing to oppose the bill unless
it is changed to their satisfaction on abortion.
Stupak wants to bar any federally subsidized insurance plan from
paying for abortions, including government-run public plans created
to compete with private insurers.
He and other abortion opponents argue federal subsidies under the
bill would help pay for insurance plans that include abortion
coverage, which means federal funds would be going toward
abortions.
Ellsworth said three or four moderate Democrats had approached him
to say his proposal would win their vote.
That might be enough for Democrats, and every vote could be
crucial when the House takes up the measure on Saturday.
Special election victories in California and New York gave
Democrats two new members and two more likely yes votes on the
healthcare bill, and leaders made plans to swear in the new members
quickly so they could vote.
Democrats now hold a 258-177 majority in the House, where 218 votes
are needed for passage.
An unknown number of Democrats are expected to join Republicans in voting against the measure, leaving the final margin too close to call.
Advertising